Virtualization and Linux: Red Hat Unveils New Vision

June 20, 2008 by vogqart

Red Hat announced a trio of virtualization initiatives today and staked out its own turf in the virtualization battle. Here’s a look at what these technologies mean to you, starting with the new Embedded Linux hypervisor.

Three strategic virtualization initiatives were the stars of the show as Linux powerhouse Red Hat opened its Red Hat Summit today in Boston. What do the Red Hat moves mean to you? More options in open source virtualization tools and a new open source effort around virtualization security, for starters.

The Red Hat move that will catch the eye of most users is the Embedded Linux Hypervisor, oVirt. This is a lightweight, embeddable hypervisor that currently lets you run Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Microsoft Windows VMs (virtual machines) on Linux. What makes this more interesting than just another virtualization announcement: you will be able to carry oVirt-customized VMs from PC to server to what-have-you in your pocket on a USB key drive, Red Hat says.

The open-source oVirt hypervisor, now available as a beta, is based on the KVM project. KVM, in turn, has been an integral part of the Linux kernel since February, 2007. In other words, this is not pie-in-the-sky technology. It’s founded on existing virtualization technologies.

At this point, followers and users of Red Hat Linux may be asking, “What about Xen?” (the best-known open-source hypervisor technology to date.) Red Hat, according to Red Hat executive VP Paul Cormier, will continue to support both Xen and KVM. But, because “KVM is now baked in to the Linux kernel, it’s very easy for both Red Hat and other developers to work with it,” Cormier says. For the time being, Xen will continue to be important, but, as time goes by, Red Hat sees KVM becoming the dominant virtualization technology, he says.

The key difference: while Xen works well with Linux, it’s an add-on. KVM, on the other hand, is an integral part of Linux. For now, Xen is the more mature of the technologies, but KVM is coming on fast and promises to be more useful for developers, Red Hat is betting.

At the end of the day, Red Hat sees KVM-based Linux distributions replacing operating system distributions, which don’t incorporate virtualization. In tomorrow’s Linux, Red Hat sees virtualization becoming simply another standard operating system feature.

While the idea of keeping a selection of virtual machines in your pocket is entertaining, Red Hat’s Virtual Infrastructure Management technology is more likely to grab a CIO’s attention.

This set of management technologies for x86-based Xen and KVM virtualization programs is also available at the oVirt Web site as a beta. Red Hat claims that this architecture enables customers to implement cloud, Software as a Service (SaaS), appliance and traditional server infrastructures across one management platform.

Last, but in the long run perhaps the most important of Red Hat’s new virtualization developments: Red Hat is offering virtualization security management technologies. In the rush to cut data center costs with virtualization, it’s only recently that some CIOs have become painfully aware that they needed management and security tools for their 21st century virtual servers.

Red Hat’s new work in virtualization security is perhaps the least mature of the trio of technologies. Still, Red Hat is working to make it possible for administrators to manage identity and policy, while simultaneously auditing system resources and application integrity. Want to know more about this project? Check into Red Hat’s newly launched FreeIPA project site. Red Hat will be more than happy to have open source community help in creating open-source solutions that could benefit every company that’s packing more and more work into fewer and fewer physical servers.

Looking ahead, Stephen O’Grady, principal analyst with the open-source analysis company RedMonk says, “Much as it has in the operating system and relational database markets, open source is poised to have a disruptive impact on the virtualization space, lowering costs for customers and offering alternatives to proprietary lock-in.”

Based on its announcements today, Red Hat intends to be a player in that disruption.

http://www.cio.com

Microsoft scrapes into top 500 supercomputer list, but IBM rules supreme

June 20, 2008 by vogqart

IBM has obliterated the competition in the supercomputing stakes with the top 10 of the top 500 supercomputers in the world, but Microsoft has surprisingly scraped in at number 23 with its Windows HPC Server system. While Microsoft is an unlucky 13 numbers away from the top 10, does the wow start now?
Microsoft can’t claim any particular ‘wow’ with its results until it can wrest a top 10 position, let alone the No.1 position away from IBM, but 23 isn’t too bad when we’re talking about a list of 500.

But the real news isn’t about Microsoft, it’s about IBM’s stunning top 10 wipeout of the competition, starting with IBM’s super speedy RoadRunner and its PETAflop of performance and power at the top of the tree, and four of its venerable Blue Gene systems also making the top 10 list.

Other supercomputer heavyweights Sun, Cray, SGI (twice) and Hewlett-Packard have also figured on the leader board, as expected.

But it’s not just the USA that is home to the world’s five fastest computers – Germany, Indian and France can also claim the kudos of a top 10 placing.

Sadly for us Aussies, we’re completely absent from the Top 500 list, although we could well be in the running for a 2009 placing.

Why? Because next year, the University of Melbourne plans to “develop the most powerful supercomputer and leading computational biology facility dedicated to life sciences research in the world.”

The university’s vice-chancellor, Professor Glyn Davis, said “The far reaching vision and scale of this initiative will combine Victoria’s already globally competitive biomedical research capability with computational infrastructure specially designed for the life sciences, equal to the best in the world.”

But what was that about Windows HPC Server, and all that ‘wow’?

Well, even though the Windows HPC Server software hasn’t quite reached release candidate stage (which reminds us of the time it took Vista to come to market) it is used on the number 23 supercomputer.

What’s it loaded onto? The NCSA’s ‘Abe’ supercomputer, powered by a Dell PowerEdge cluster with a peak performance of 88.3 teraflops. It’s far, far from the one PETAflop of IBM power, but it’s still the 23rd most powerful computer in the world.

But to put that into perspective, it’s roughly one-quarter of the performance of the number 2 supercomputer (an IBM Blue Gene at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) and less than one-eleventh of Roadrunner’s.

So Microsoft still has a long way to go, but it’s also the actual hardware that’s important. Dell aren’t using the IBM Cell processor, after all.

And Abe isn’t exclusively running Windows either. While it is the fastest Windows cluster to date, Abe also runs Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4!

“Our experience with Windows HPC Server 2008 has been impressive,” said Robert Pennington, deputy director of the NCSA.

“Deploying it was much easier than we expected, and the performance results have surpassed our expectations. When we deployed Windows on our cluster, which has more than 1000 nodes, we went from bare metal to running the LINPACK benchmark programs in just four hours. The performance of Windows HPC Server 2008 has yielded efficiencies that are among the highest we’ve seen for this class of machine.”

Microsoft will also be happy to see that two other Windows HPC systems made the top 100.

Sweden’s Umea University runs its IBM BladeCenter cluster of 672 blade servers on Windows HPC, the first time the system software has been publicly run on IBM hardware.

Big Blue is enthusiastic: “By working closely together on Windows HPC Server 2008, our customers are already seeing improved efficiency rates,” said Dave Jursik, vice president of supercomputer sales at IBM.

“This industry partnership with Microsoft plays a vital role in achieving our goal to create powerful cluster solutions that address the growing needs of researchers such as the scientists at Umea.”

Of course, it’s easy for IBM to be so gracious when they otherwise wipe the floor with Microsoft’s efforts.

And just slipping in at number 100 is Germany’s Universitaet Aachen/RWTH with a Fujitsu Siemens Primergy cluster.

The release candidate of Windows HPC Server 2008 is to be made available for download in the last week of June.

If only you could get all those old 486 and Pentium machines out of your garage to give the HPC Server 2008 a go! But sadly that will be a firm no-go.

For any super-speedy hardware and performance, forget Microsoft – and look to acquiring a large stack of IBM Cell processors to make your own RoadRunner. Beep Beep!

http://www.itwire.com

Red Hat Network to be open-sourced

June 19, 2008 by vogqart

Red Hat plans to announce Thursday that it is open-sourcing Red Hat Network (RHN), its Web-based Linux infrastructure management platform, according to CEO Jim Whitehurst.
“We think it will develop more quickly, and we’ll have an instant community of use,” Whitehurst said in an interview on Wednesday at the Red Hat Summit conference in Boston. “We’ll find bugs we didn’t know about and features will get added. We believe it’s a superior model for developing software.”

The move is important for keeping up the company’s image, he suggested.

“I think strategic clarity is important. We are open source, and everything we do is open source.”

Further details were not available Wednesday, but Red Hat is expected to reveal more during a press conference on Thursday.

http://www.linuxworld.com

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .